Image
Maritime

Image courtesy of Ericsson

What is the problem to be solved?

As a fundamental enabler for the evolution of modern maritime port operations, digital communications not only respond to demands for the safe exchange of data, but also contribute to the efficient management of the movement of people and goods. Ports worldwide are already adopting new technologies in a bid to increase productivity and provide better, more cost-effective services to customers. It is therefore vital that UK ports follow this initiative to remain competitive.

Ports are an interface between UK trade and transport with the digital interface a significant consideration for frictionless operations. Ports are a hub for the movement of goods and people.
The largest ports in the UK, such as Port of Southampton, Port of Felixstowe, and Port of London, handle more than 18 million tonnes of containers, 6.5 million passengers, and over 800,000 vehicle imports and exports annually. 

The largest container ships carry over 200,000 tonnes of cargo in over 20,000 containers, so the sheer scale of operation becomes clearer. Managing the movement of this volume of goods involves an array of machinery. 
 

Ports are complex environments with many buildings and a lot of large metal structures which block radio waves. Moving container stacks, ships, machinery and cranes dynamically shift areas of good and poor connectivity, adding complexity to any network deployment. The density of connection points and masts required are therefore greater than a fixed urban environment. Mobile network operators have not prioritised ports connectivity due to these technical challenges and the business model, with typically relatively low number of users and revenue associated.

All the physical assets in ports are becoming increasingly digitally enabled, tracked, and monitored, sometimes even remotely operated or automated. The range of systems and applications active in and around commercial ports is growing in capability and the range of activities undertaken. This is why coverage, capability and resilience of communications technologies is critical for UK ports. 

Some of the bigger ports are investing in 5G to explore and implement services to improve safety and efficiency. This includes inspection drones and autonomous vehicles “shunters” plus other services providing monitoring or automation plus AI insights in and around the ports. Better connected ports are more likely to benefit from the “digital revolution”, than those which are not.

With over 120 commercial cargo ports across the UK, supporting containers, ferries and bulk cargo the need for improved and robust communications is clear. As the size of the ports and investment available varies across UK ports, a common understanding of the challenges and approach to the investment in connectivity / digital products available, will support all ports and not just the largest.

Ports are complex environments in many aspects with various organisations owning and running different aspects of the port operation. Port-dedicated communication systems using private cellular networks will be used by multiple organisations, with multiple applications and priorities. Therefore, who decides which applications get priority becomes key, particularly for bottlenecks or emergencies. 

Ports owned by a variety of different organisations who are effectively in competition for trade, so cooperation and sharing of investment and operational best practice is sometimes limited. 

Acknowledgment:
This Toolkit was generated with significant contribution from publications by Connected Places Catapult (“Future Communication as an enabler at ports”, 2024), with additional inputs from Maritime UK, British Ports Association and Ericsson.
 

Image
Ports

 

Image
port

What is the solution to the problem?

Reliable wireless communications are needed across ports to provide connectivity with mobile devices which are increasingly becoming essential to operational processes. Wi-Fi has been utilised in many ports which has benefitted from high availability of devices, but Wi-Fi has limited range of up to 100m and is prone to signal blocking by the harsh port environment. This makes it expensive to provide reliable coverage due to the large numbers of access points required. 

Cellular networks require a relatively small number of base stations (masts) with capacity for additional device connections or signal boost to improve “not spots” of connectivity, provided through 5G Small Cells. These Small Cells can be installed on existing lamp posts or similar assets which have power and nearby fibre. Small Cells have a much greater range than Wi-Fi and enhance commercial and private standalone 5G provision, supporting high numbers of device connections (phones or monitoring devices) for example at passenger hubs such as passenger ferry terminals. Overall, a more reliable connectivity is possible using 5G for the harsh transmission environment of ports. 

As demand for wireless connectivity increases to support digital services, ports need to switch over from 4G (where available) to 5G to support the higher data volumes and lower latency services. The higher bandwidth and higher frequencies allow the data rate required and improves reliability of service. 5G provides additional advantages of better cyber security. Reliability of service can be achieved if private networks are used, enabling leasing of connectivity and data provision to others.

Ports that are near or in urban areas are more likely to benefit from good cellular coverage offered by a public network run by an MNO (Mobile Network Operator). However, public networks generally cannot be relied upon to meet the needs of critical business services because during periods of high user demand, the Quality of Service (QoS) for communications can fall below acceptable levels. 

There are however four ways of delivering commercial and private networks in the cellular bands which would provide the QoS required for safety critical products and services: 

‘Network slicing’: This is where MNOs use software to provide a virtual private network with agreed QoS characteristics such as bandwidth allocation and target latency. As one of the latest 

  • features introduced for 5G in 3GPP Release 18, MicroSlicing enables a level of QoS control similar to private Wi-Fi networks through virtual data pipelines. This facilitates more granular prioritised QoS controls for each data service.
  • Spectrum trading: This is a mechanism for an MNO to lease or transfer their spectrum to a business via contractual agreement. 
  • Local Access licence: This is a framework provided by the regulator Ofcom that allows businesses to access spectrum which has already been licenced to MNOs, in locations where an MNO is not using their spectrum. 
  • Shared Access Licence: This is a framework provided by Ofcom to license a significant spectrum band of 3.8-4.2Ghz (known as N77) to businesses. The aim of sharing access is to support local wireless connectivity applications.

The four options offer different solutions. Through network slicing, an MNO’s infrastructure provides a private network to a business.  Whereas spectrum trading or access licensing are ways a business can secure private access to the cellular spectrum for use by their own infrastructure.

Demand for mobile network “spectrum” is rising because of 5G deployments (5G networks use more spectrum than previous generations of networks, since they aim to deliver higher speeds). Ofcom has now allocated significant dedicated 5G spectrum specifically for ‘industrial’ use-cases and other local deployments of 5G networks, which can be used by ports as well.

Several next steps are listed below, with potential government organisations identified to lead a collaborative dialogue to develop each initiative:

  • BUSINESS CASES FOR REPRESENTATIVE PORT GROUPS NEED DEVELOPING. The biggest ports in the UK are investing in 5G in their environments. Medium and smaller sized ports where revenue and capital investment are more challenging are not benefitting from the learning and business opportunities. This requires a collaborative approach between MNO’s, private network service suppliers and equipment providers to generate a suite of Business models to rapidly transform UK ports. Funding required should be identified with clear asks of central government where necessary. This should be led by DSIT.
  • CREATE A NETWORK OF PORTS WILLING TO SUPPORT TRIALLING of new digital products and services and in particular autonomous services and vehicles. This will accelerate and nurture product development in the UK. Funding is required to provide ports the capability with connectivity to setup and support vehicle trials. This should be led by DSIT.
  • AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE DEVELOPMENT for shunters, cargo movers and drones to support improvements in efficiency, maintenance and safety in the port environment. Currently European supply is not ready to provide such vehicles. Innovation investment is required to develop these vehicles to be market ready. This should be led by DfT (CCAV – Centre for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles)

Each of these options will require funding and outputs of government led investment allows sharing across port operators and owners. Ports are commercial entities and without investment by government this information is viewed as commercially sensitive.


Commercial model (Business Case)

Handling 95% of UK imports and exports, maritime ports are the country’s gateway with international markets. Not only do they generate revenue for a nationwide network of direct and indirect suppliers and service providers, but UK ports also employ around 125,000 people.

There are over 400 non-cargo handling ports and 120 cargo handling ports in the UK ( Ports | Maritime UK). The cargo handling ports, which are the biggest ports, stand to gain the most from improved mobile communications. The number of these large ports in each of the UK countries are listed below:

  • England: 80
  • Scotland: 20
  • Wales: 10
  • Northern Ireland: 10

The types of ports in the UK can be categorised as:

  • All-purpose: Handle a variety of cargo types.
  • Container: Specialize in handling containerized cargo.
  • Ferry: Facilitate passenger and vehicle ferry services.
  • Bulk cargo: Handle bulk commodities like coal, oil, and grain.
  • Specialized: Cater to specific types of cargo or industries, such as fishing or leisure boating.

     

The largest ports by type are listed below:

 

Safety is a priority in ports as with other industries, some statistics regarding injuries to people (Loss Time Injury), listed in 2022 by the port Skills and Safety shows for the >200 injuries:

  • the most common incident locations berth/quayside/alongside a vessel and on container ships and represent 45% of injury locations in 2022
  • The second most common incident locations are roadways/parking area – with public access, roadways/parking area – no public access and the non-specific ‘other location.’
  • Container vessels continue to be the most likely vessel type on which to have an incident, a trend repeated year on year.
Image
port

Benefits

The benefits of 5G communications and 5G enabled products and services are evidenced from several recent studies.

A White Paper issued by British Ports Association and Rotterdam (Move Forward: Step by step towards a digital port) providing the following summary for the impact of digital services established in Port of Rotterdam. Automating the individual parties in the port enables data collection. This is used to make the port run more cost- effectively, more safely and more sustainably. Implementation of a digital port Management System (PMS) in Rotterdam has had significant benefits with an overall benefit of approximately €160 million per year:

  • Shortened the turnaround time for ships by 30 minutes. Container handling equipment tracks cranes, straddle carriers, and other handling equipment availability and utilisation. Container tracking monitors movements within the port, ensuring timely loading and unloading. Coordination of vessel arrivals, departures, and berth allocation is also possible. The port optimises resource allocation, minimises waiting times, and enhances overall efficiency by analysing data. Assuming a vessel costs €10,000 per hour, this means around €150 million in annual savings is realisable for the port of Rotterdam. 
  • Reduction of the number of incidents with lost time associated, results in savings of €7 million per year. 
  • Port staff can be deployed more efficiently: annual savings of €2 million. Despite the expansion of Maasvlakte 2, the staff levels of the Harbour Master’s Division shrunk.

     

Evidence from the UK Port of Tyne, a study run with Ericsson and BT, demonstrated: 

  • 50% reduction in time spent inspecting assets using drones.
  • 56% installation and maintenance cost reduction using 5G connected CCTV, reducing the need for fibre connection and reducing the logistics associated with groundworks to provide.
  • AI based video feed from the CCTV was used to check:
    • correct PPE usage and compliance by port personnel.
    • scanning the containers for damage and identification.
  • vehicle tracking on approach, entry and within the confines of the port environment.
  • Other use cases that focus on “Efficiency, Operations and Safety” using drones, CCTV and IoT monitoring devices include:
  • Intelligent berthing for ships and boats in the harbour.
  • High bay storage, a relatively new approach to handling containers in terminals.
  • Preventative maintenance and condition monitoring of cargo, cranes & machinery.
  • Tracking using IoT devices of assets, people or cargo to optimise the logistics of movement and storage in the port environment.
  • Perishable goods monitoring for food and pharmaceuticals to assure the product welfare.
  • Logistics of containers and mixed consignments can be tracked, helping haulage companies optimise operations, avoid delays as well as preventing loss and theft of goods. Faster collection of goods reduces importer costs and eses port congestion.
  • Port emissions and pollution monitoring.
  • Monitoring and optimising energy consumption such as lighting or climate devices.
  • In addition, there is a significant opportunity for AUTOMATION especially in the larger commercial ports. This grouping of products and services requires low latency and reliable data, with high reliability to support remote control and supervision of equipment as an example. The use case therefore overviews some existing communications standards intended for safety, reliability, or time critical applications. Several significant product examples requiring robust communications are:
  • Operation of drones used for surveillance.
  • Shunters (Automated Vehicles) used for moving containers and machinery around the port.
  • Automated Transport vehicles to shuttle personnel around the port on demand. 
  • Autonomous Navigation Technology for cargo and equipment movement.
  • Remote crane operations with high-definition video.
Image
port of tyne
Image
port of tyne

Lessons Learnt 

Private networks and non-commercial spectrum are both appealing concepts for ports to minimise costs, but the fibre connection and power requirements for more rural ports can still present challenges.

Felixstowe, Belfast and Southampton have invested in 5G development and trials exploring new product development to further improve the operation and safety in their ports. The Connected Places Catapult are actively supporting Innovation in the maritime industry.

One port owner told Connected Places Catapult that the N77 shared access licence band is not yet well supported by providers of commercial IoT and monitoring devices. There may be a situation where device manufacturers are waiting for a critical mass of 5G roll-out before re-engineering their products.

Port operators and stakeholders need to build cyber security into communications and the products and services already being used as well as designing in from early concept for new products. Cyber security then requires consistent management on an ongoing basis to provide resilience and sufficiently mitigate risks. The large scale and complex nature of port and maritime systems, plus the range of operational processes and diversity of communications technologies, combine to make cyber security challenging.

A range of references and materials used in this publication are listed below:

Connected Places Catapult

Connectivity in Ports…. The Future of Communications as an Enabler at Ports - Connected Places Catapult

Innovation in maritime…. UK Maritime Innovation Ecosystem - Connected Places Catapult

DCMS funded ports with 5G deployments (2019-2022)

Portland Harbour and supporting connectivity, agriculture and aquaculture…. 5G Rural Dorset.

Deployments of IoT, use of CCTV and AI to increase the efficiency of operations …. 5G Create.

5G deployment study in Bristol by West Of England Combined Authority….  Summary report on potential 5G use within UK ports

British Ports Association

UK Ports Directory with a comprehensive list of all ports around the coast of the UK…. britishports.org.uk/content/uploads/2024/09/UK-Ports-Directory-2024_25-with-covers-72dpi.pdf

Mobile coverage maps for the x4 MNO’s for a number of UK ports along with a short study in to coverage in ports…. BPA-Mobile-Coverage-and-Deployments-in-Ports.pdf

Step by Step Towards a Digital Port…. Port-of-Rotterdam-and-British-Ports-Association-digital-port-white-paper-August-2019.pdf

Automation in Ports… Automation-of-ships-in-ports-and-harbours.pdf

Ericsson demonstrations:

BT and Ericsson study of 5G deployed and benefits in Tynemouth Port of Tyne goes live with 5G private network - Ericsson